• Home
  • About
  • Trust Ladder
  • Publications
  • Contact
  • English
    • Français
alavisealavise
  • Home
  • About
  • Trust Ladder
  • Publications
  • Contact
  • English
    • Français
Current S&P500 level anticipates real GDP growth by 17 years

Current S&P500 level anticipates real GDP growth by 17 years

September 20, 2017 Change Management, Private Banking, Reaction

This article has been initially published for french speaking swiss economic magazine Bilan.

Does anyone understand why S&P500 is reaching these levels while World GDP is growing much slower?

While discussing with a bullish trader, I asked the question and the answer was, “economy is growing, so is S&P”.

Fine, but let’s compare the growths we are talking about.

It is fair to assume that S&P500 is fueled by global economy, as the companies composing the index are mostly globalized for revenues and costs.

The S&P500 is an average of 500 large US companies.

Some may grow faster than others. But on average, the index should more or less follow global growth.

Therefore, it is reasonable and makes sense to compare S&P500 growth with World GDP growth[1].

I created this graph starting at the S&P500 level of 247 at the beginning of 1988 (source Yahoo! Finance). The Orange line shows actual S&P500 value. The blue line starts at same 247 level and grows at the real rate of World GDP (source: World Bank)[2].

We may admit that there is growth anticipation in companies stock value. Trump promises are part of it. Let’s have a closer look.

5% is the average global GDP growth since 1988.

Assuming a 5% average annual growth from now on, World GDP would reach the current S&P500 level in… 2034.

This is 17 years anticipation!

Of course we can explain this by low interest rates, massive injection of liquidity into the system, credit leverage, financial industry which nurtures itself and, more recently, Trump trade.

But credits need to be reimbursed at some point, and behind financial industry you have real companies with a stock value that should represent intrinsic companies value, therefore their profit and growth, therefore real world GDP.

We can anticipate a bit (because of credit and optimism), but 17 years?

How much is enough?

The graph shows GDP and S&P started to diverge in 1995.

Could anyone recall what happened in year 1995 or just before, because it seems there is a crucial trigger there?

For sure, this is during 1990s that the process of deregulation was finalized in most countries.

When Internet bubble burst in 2000, the anticipation was 24 years. In 2007, when subprime collapsed, anticipation was 17 years.

By the end of 2008, real world and stocks were abruptly, but perfectly, re-aligned.

Quantitative Easing was introduced to support real economy and clearly fueled financial markets divergence again. Until when?

These questions are important and not just for traders or people anxious to manage their retirement capital, because with each financial crash, the real economy also suffers, severely.

I always welcome your feed-back.

__________________

[1] Even for companies in the S&P that would focus on the US Market (any?), World GDP is still a good benchmark, as World GDP growth is aligned with US GDP growth (not surprisingly for a global economy).

[2] Calculation sheet

1

You also might be interested in

Swiss Private Banking: The True Price of Transparency

Swiss Private Banking: The True Price of Transparency

Mar 10, 2017

The next challenge of the Swiss Wealth Management industry is true client centricity: focus on service rather than transactions, clients advising rather than products distribution, the life time value of a client relationship rather than costs alone, and a fair win-win price. With this it could achieve renewed long-term profitable development.

Swiss Private Banking: Has Anything Changed?

Swiss Private Banking: Has Anything Changed?

Jul 3, 2016

You may work on cost and risk, you have to, but you should make sure the people who lead these projects work ultimately for clients' satisfaction and not just regulators'. As regulator expect nothing else from banks than working for best client interest.

Coup d’Oeil on international Wealth Management news

Coup d’Oeil on international Wealth Management news

Jan 24, 2017

Note from the Editor In Coup d’Oeil, we observe the[...]

Search

Catégories

  • Change Management (19)
  • Client Orientation (15)
  • Coup d'oeil (2)
  • Private Banking (14)
  • Reaction (3)
  • Transformation Digitale (1)

Articles récents

  • Taking control of one’s digital transformation
  • Current S&P500 level anticipates real GDP growth by 17 years
  • Swiss Private Banking: The True Price of Transparency
  • Coup d’Oeil on international Wealth Management news
Accelerate your projects with alavise Contact

Geneva, Switzerland
© 2026 alavise advisory. All rights reserved.

Prev Next